I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that there's some supporting quotes from actual rulings in the section "Definitional issues" that show that circumstantial evidence dirilik be used to determine whether it's child porn. Perhaps the two sections should be merged into an "Issues" section?
I found it was unnecssary to quote the source; citation was sufficient. I therefore removed the quote from the lolita sorun article.
Any images or videos that depict children in a pornographic context are to be considered child pornography in Sweden, even if they are drawings.[100] A "child" is defined bey a “person†who is either under the age of 18 or who katışıksız not passed puberty.[101]
WASHINGTON (AP) — In the court of public opinion — like the Supreme Court nomination hearings coming this week — politicians ask questions of witnesses to score points for their side. In the court of law, judges ask questions to get answers.
My take on that Examples section is this: there is value in adding a section on what, exactly, courts have and have hamiÅŸ found to be KP, and the first paragraph or so of that section is a good start on what such a section might look like. But then it goes off on a bizarre tangent that appears to have nothing to do with the subject of the article. It seems like POV-pushing of some kind, though I'm not entirely clear on what POV is being pushed.
and still subject to judicial interpretation, controversy of all kinds re: thought versus action. I don't think what you said is wrong, just incomplete. re definitions, it's the same issue bey terrorism - a vague bad thing that the developed world uniquely hates because they expect a certain standard of safety to apply to a child or civilian life. Even though the vast majority of people in the world do not have that degree of security. --Unknown
PADUCAH, Ky. (AP) — A man who was charged by federal prosecutors Long live Fascism with producing child pornography after former Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin issued a commutation for state sex crime convictions özgü been sentenced to eight years in prison.
I combined the sections by removing the yasal issues header. I am open to retitling the section, but did not think, given the above discussion this would be overly controversial.
It's hamiÅŸ only practice, it's law. The cited law does hamiÅŸ require proof of the depicted people's ages, so you could say the prosecution is going above the call of duty when they offer the filenames birli evidence of age.
However, it should be noted that Çakma Cialis there are no known instances where the example photo katışıksız karı satan pezevenk sitesi been officially considered child pornography.
Not really - bey the article says, they are only one of several precedents that are using in judging whether an image is pornographic, so considering them in isolation is misleading.
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A Fresno man who was part a California karı satan pezevenk sitesi child exploitation ring in which members filmed themselves sexually abusing more than 20 children and then distributed the footage on the dark web was sentenced to life in prison Friday, prosecutors said.
So the arguments quoted may or may hamiÅŸ have been important to the judgment of the case, which does hamiÅŸ seem to have been an important precedent.
Firstly this is confusing, what were these statistics on, were they on the harm child pornography does, were they on the rates of child pornography distrubtion? Secondly what evidence was there that these statistics were dubious, this looks to me like more pro child pornography yaymaca.